Capitalism must be overthrown to save the planet
THE world is currently going through a period of warming 1.1 ° C above pre-industrial levels. This is what caused the fires, floods, droughts and more severe hurricanes and typhoons.
- Doubling the loss of plant species, essential to human survival in terms of food security
- The tripling of the loss of insect species
- Arctic ice 10 times more likely to melt
Currently, the world is heading towards 2.4 ° C of warming. This will leave parts of the world uninhabitable.
READ MORE: Ineos boss ‘absolutely shocked’ by Scottish carbon capture project snub
The COP26 agreement left the system in place that allowed this to happen. The status quo approach is literally a crime against humanity.
It is accelerating the mass extinction of the human race. All this to ensure that quarterly corporate profits can continue to grow.
The failure of COP26 is the failure of the capitalist system. Only 100 companies are responsible for 71% of all global CO2 emissions.
The damage caused by capitalism will be greater than the aggregate value of all goods produced since the start of the industrial revolution.
READ MORE: Scotland ‘must accelerate its move away from fossil fuels’, says FM
Past prosperity will be paid for by reduced life on Earth in the near future.
The reason no action has been taken is that fossil fuel companies and the banks that lend to them have been funding climate change denial networks for decades.
Corrupt and friendly “spokespersons” in the media are then sent to lie with the polluter’s propaganda. This creates doubt about the link between fossil fuels and climate change. It then stops any reduction in fossil energy consumption.
An alliance of 77 island nations, including China, had pleaded for a loss-and-damage financing facility. It was a question of compensating for the damage suffered by the pollution of the rich nations. However, the EU, UK and US have sabotaged this.
READ MORE: Climate change is nothing new and we’ve known the solutions for decades
Compare that with the trillions of pounds this government has invested to save the global financial system. The £ 100 billion pledged in 2009 to mitigate the effects of climate change has not been paid.
The 1.5C Paris Agreement target is dead. It is a consequence of the capitalist system that must be overthrown.
JIM Fairlie suggesting that ‘Turning to Scottish meat could help slow the effects of climate change’ (14 November) recalls two key points of the world order that I feel were left out of climate change considerations at COP26 .
The first is what Fairlie is alluding to: the fundamental premise that transporting goods halfway around the world rather than stocking up on basic necessities in our backyard when they can easily be – resulting in huge spending on carbon-emitting fossil fuels – mitigates any claim that we have climate change at the heart of our priorities.
At a time when this is surely obvious to all, Boris-led Brexit Britain has deliberately worked to fix the opposite of common sense, encouraging trade with the Far East and the Antipodes rather than favoring trade with our European neighbors. How can anyone who claims to be serious about controlling climate change claim that it makes sense?
READ MORE: Senior Scottish Tories risk losing general election seats, poll finds
The second must surely be the inexorable increase in human population. Regardless of all the other measures adopted at COP26, most of which seem likely to prove to be loopholes, the increase in the human population, fueling economic growth, will put unbearable pressure on the ecology of the Earth contrary to the alleged ambitions. of COP26.
It is often argued that the carbon-emitting fuels used since the British Industrial Revolution are partly responsible for contemporary and future concerns about climate change. Major users of fossil fuels like China, India, USA etc. cite their need to fuel their own industrial production as their right to do so, with little regard for those who bear the climatic burden of their selfish madness.
In reality, isn’t there much need to conserve fossil fuels due to the growing world population that has grown exponentially? 1.25 billion in 1850, to a conservative estimate of 7.75 billion and more by 2050. How can we expect our planet to cope with this without changing the climate?
Isn’t it the free market of capitalism feeding on economic growth that should really be of concern to us? Will it not be our inability to restrict unhindered growth for the benefit of investors that will be the nail in our coffin of climate change?
And what could be a more powerful example of this than allowing, under all circumstances, even a square foot of rainforest vital for carbon processing to be felled for any economic activity? Or allow India, a country with a myriad of poor people who can somehow afford a space program, to dilute the imperative to end the use of coal rather than end it and invest instead in renewable energies that protect the climate?
Has Brexit not only turned out to be economic folly, but in terms of climate change simply an insane contribution to the disaster?
Don’t we need to drastically reduce the non-economic climate cost incurred between production and consumption as suggested by Fairlie, while reducing the dynamic of growth where those who get richer only get richer at the expense of the planet? that we all hope to be able to offer a sustainable future for us and these generations to follow?